The most economical mode of operation UAZ - to put it in the garage and not put out. Fuel consumption - simply fabulous! And as for depreciation of units and units: only obsolescence ....
As for: in winter the city shutting down the front. I tried. A cow on the ice - it is not entirely accurate description of the behavior of UAZ. With the inclusion of front fascia - easy going. Disengaged - IT WORKS!

Victor wrote: As for: in winter the city off from the front. I tried. A cow on the ice - it is not entirely accurate description of the behavior of UAZ. With the inclusion of front fascia - easy going. Disengaged - IT WORKS!

Well here is difficult to accept, but also to refute as it is not with his hands. When I went to UAZ-3909: there, yes ... always underloaded ass forced to work on the road. And at 469 I like it more as I go on rear-wheel drive and, in principle, it is annoying me greatly. And about the fuel consumption: the connected hubs increase fuel consumption on the strength of 1-2%. (This is from my experience) A "winter" consumption as a whole increased by 6-8% (according to the standards 10%). Previously I have written and now repeat it correctly rigged system to UAZke can consume under ideal conditions, about 8 liters per 100 km. (UAZ-3909 in 2000 with a trip to the Shire). Now "Camomile" try to start the squeeze flow in the passport data from-20, 100 km.

Putting them in Kemerovo. There - on the federal highway. Back - on the lower road. By federalke had about 90. By "lower" - 80. Download: I'm a passenger. Speedometer from garage to garage - 464 km. Of these, approximately 30 kilometers - the Tomsk and about 20 - to Kemerovo. Expenses "on the circle" was released about 13 liters per 100 km.
Incidentally, in the evening stuck in traffic jams and Tomsk from the camp garden to Ivanovo more than an hour riding .......
And yet - flow like this came out.

Victor
And what a carburetor is??

Victor - 126 th follower.

mitek wrote: Victor - 126 th follower.

Absolutely "the hole"! Reliability.

Victor, Shrews-hub often mazhesh?

mitek wrote: Victor, Shrews-hub often mazhesh?

Hubs (rear) missed the first time through 150 km of mileage. Front - often. But not much "more often "....
Shrews are not syringes. As to the ball pin changed - never. Not proshpritsuesh them. The ball is blocking access through the press litol maslenku.Shkvornya grease separately in about 20 ... 25 thousand kilometers just take off the cover pins and take out half of the pin, balls, rubbed and lay fresh litol.
Is going to remove the Shrews - look what's so like. Left began snapping at twisted wheel and connect the front axle. Probably time for him left. Still, 170 km. Of these, approximately 70 thousand kilometers - under load (winter from November to March summer + gryazepokatushki gribovno-fishing).

Shrews in the Oise? In da from life behind ...

Sanya wrote: Shrews in Wothe? In da from life behind ...

Constant-velocity
As it does not surprise many - but that "crap" with five balls (one centering, four - working) - this is the constant velocity joints.

I wonder how Sanya calls "that crap with five balls"? A friend of mine calls the steering plow steering shaft.

Victor wrote:

Sanya wrote: Shrews in Wothe? In da from life behind ...

Constant-velocity
As it does not surprise many - but that "crap" with five balls (one centering, four - working) - this is the constant velocity joints.

Yes I know what CV Joints

As the owner of the new UAP-and immediately decided to calculate how much the cost of its operation, including gasoline. For this solution I've found a pile and began to write down all refueling (checks or try to take the gas stations every time, or keeping track of how many flooded and how much). Periodically am submitting these data to a file, without singling out, however, city or highway to the rear, or both, winter heating and flushing the tank after the first TO, the style of driving, as he falls into, etc.
The file is just stupid overall bathed in UAZ gasoline on the total mileage
To date, run 7450 km, the charge amounted to 15.5 l/100 km (for comparison, just think for puzoterke - there is 7.7 l/100 km).
Yes, the UAZ-e now even splashing about 30 liters of gasoline, correction is possible to estimate, but it will not weather

A bit more about now than Art, but - in the subject.
According to the glorious city of Tomsk is now regarded as consumption - waste of time. In Kemerovo movement - moving, and the Tomsk - crawling. From KemTIPP (who knows - Boulevard Builders) across town to leave the old road (the one - that along the coast to the Tom Yurga goes), drove for 25 minutes. Вобщем something not strongly guided to choose the "optimal route (went like this: about me - in-a-go he must). From Jurga to Tomsk - about a half hour. And from the camp garden to Ivanovo - 1 hour 25 minutes. Friendships - the speed was 1-2. From so now .... In the oil industry work.

Vic, you're right, your cork thicker!
This is because we have street Shirshov!
Your route Kemerovo about as much time and pulls. Only if it is to go on weekdays from 8 to 9 in the morning or in the opposite direction from 17 to 19 at night, you can get to 40-60 minutes.
Often knocking her daughter in Tomsk (in your Polytechnic Institute student), the movement in a more tense.
In another weekend normally, but in everyday life - just crawling.
For that you have a way better, when you go on to Jurga Alaev - suspension groans, but from Alaev to Tomsk, and further in the direction Molchanovo - even sideways scram. Although swamp around, and the track does not warp.

Victor wrote: Absolutely "in the hole! Reliability.

+1 Also it is

Art wrote: Today ran 7450 km, the charge amounted to 15,5 l/100 km

Yesterday had to go to Molchanovo both on the track I expense was 14 l/100km. A native of Seversk about 15,5 l/100km

At the weekend trip to the village. At the circle has turned 304 km. Consumption - just over 35 liters (before arriving in Tomsk from Irkutsk - gorochka. Gasoline stack in the corner of the tank and UAZ wildly. Total: 35:3,04 = 11,5

And I am again.
Bosses 35 liters. At 312 km (from garage to garage) enough. He looked into the tank - there is still something left. Liter or half. Prinebrezhem this balance. Total consumption of 11.2 liters per 100 km. That way - I'm a passenger. Conversely - I and two passengers. Speed - 80 ... 90 km / h. Conversely - a couple of times 105 km / h accelerated when overtaking.

Efficiency of the engine less than 3%, the efficiency of internal combustion engines of less than 20% efficiency at UAZ 18l. and 11.5 liters per hundred kilometers. vary greatly and at the rate of 11.5 liters per 100 kilometers. CAP UAZ divinely tall, given his gear to the wheels themselves more than pound wheels.

MNS wrote: efficiency of the engine less than 3%, the efficiency of internal combustion engines of less than 20% efficiency at UAZ 18l. and 11.5 liters per hundred kilometers. vary greatly and at the rate of 11.5 liters per 100 kilometers. CAP UAZ divinely tall, given his gear to the wheels themselves more than pound wheels.

Considers all the same, that is the result:
1. Proper and timely adjustments (hub bearings, plugs, valves, etc.).
2. Manners ride (without frequent braking and acceleration, dynamic acceleration, etc.).
3. Processing Engine, bridges and boxes - Forsanom.

Victor wrote: 2. Manners ride (without frequent braking and acceleration, dynamic acceleration, etc.).

Boring tag

ale wrote:

Victor wrote: 2. Manners ride (without frequent braking and acceleration, dynamic acceleration, etc.).

Boring tag

I - not about the city we am! A pro - on the road "....

The city can charge for two multiply safely

ale wrote: In the town of consumption can easily multiply two

That's right!